Victora, C. G., Huicho, L., Amaral, J. J., Armstrong-Schellenberg, J., Manzi, F., Mason, E. and Scherpbier, R. (2006) Are health interventions implemented where they are most needed? District uptake of the integrated management of childhood illness strategy in Brazil, Peru and the United Republic of Tanzania. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 84 (10). pp. 792-801. ISSN 0042-9686
17128359.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial.
To describe geographical patterns of implementation of the Integrated Management of Childhood Illness (IMCI) strategy in three countries and to assess whether the strategy was implemented in areas with the most pressing child health needs.
We conducted interviews with key informants at the national and district levels in Brazil, Peru and the United Republic of Tanzania, and an ecological study of factors associated with health worker training in IMCI. Explanatory factors included district population, distance from the capital, human development index, other socioeconomic indicators and baseline mortality rates in children younger than five years.
In line with recommendations by WHO, early implementation districts were characterized by proximity to the capital and suitable training sites, presence of motivated health managers and a functioning health system. In the expansion phase, IMCI tended to be adopted by other districts with similar characteristics. In Brazil, uptake by poor and small municipalities and those further away from the state capital was significantly lower. In Peru, there was no association with distance from Lima, and a non-significant trend for IMCI adoption by small and poor departments. In the United Republic of Tanzania, the only statistically significant finding was a lower uptake by remote districts. Implementation was not associated with baseline mortality levels in any country studied.
Whereas clear and reasonable guidelines are provided for selection of early use districts, no criteria for promoting IMCI expansion had been issued, and areas of greatest need were not prioritized. Equity analyses based on the geographical deployment of new programmes and strategies can contribute to assessing whether they are reaching those who need them most.
|Keywords:||Child health, illness, health interventions, Brazil, Peru, Tanzania, health policy, policy analysis|
|Subjects:||Health Systems > Surveillance, monitoring & evaluation
Health Systems > Quality of Care
|Divisions:||Ifakara Health Institute > Policy Translation|
|Depositing User:||Mr Joseph Madata|
|Date Deposited:||27 Jul 2012 08:35|
|Last Modified:||16 Aug 2012 15:57|
Actions (login required)
Downloads per month over past year