ehealth digital library

Digital library of
the Tanzania

Promoting Universal Financial Protection: Evidence from Seven Low- and Middle-Income Countries on Factors Facilitating or Hindering Progress.

McIntyre, D., Ranson, M. K., Aulakh, B. K. and Honda, A. (2013) Promoting Universal Financial Protection: Evidence from Seven Low- and Middle-Income Countries on Factors Facilitating or Hindering Progress. Health research policy and systems / BioMed Central, 11. p. 36. ISSN 1478-4505

Di_McIntyre.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial.

Download (212kB)


Although universal health coverage (UHC) is a global health policy priority, there remains limited evidence on UHC reforms in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). This paper provides an overview of key insights from case studies in this thematic series, undertaken in seven LMICs (Costa Rica, Georgia, India, Malawi, Nigeria, Tanzania, and Thailand) at very different stages in the transition to UHC.These studies highlight the importance of increasing pre-payment funding through tax funding and sometimes mandatory insurance contributions when trying to improve financial protection by reducing out-of-pocket payments. Increased tax funding is particularly important if efforts are being made to extend financial protection to those outside formal-sector employment, raising questions about the value of pursuing contributory insurance schemes for this group. The prioritisation of insurance scheme coverage for civil servants in the first instance in some LMICs also raises questions about the most appropriate use of limited government funds.The diverse reforms in these countries provide some insights into experiences with policies targeted at the poor compared with universalist reform approaches. Countries that have made the greatest progress to UHC, such as Costa Rica and Thailand, made an explicit commitment to ensuring financial protection and access to needed care for the entire population as soon as possible, while this was not necessarily the case in countries adopting targeted reforms. There also tends to be less fragmentation in funding pools in countries adopting a universalist rather than targeting approach. Apart from limiting cross-subsidies, fragmentation of pools has contributed to differential benefit packages, leading to inequities in access to needed care and financial protection across population groups; once such differentials are entrenched, they are difficult to overcome. Capacity constraints, particularly in purchasing organisations, are a pervasive problem in LMICs. The case studies also highlighted the critical role of high-level political leadership in pursuing UHC policies and citizen support in sustaining these policies.This series demonstrates the value of promoting greater sharing of experiences on UHC reforms across LMICs. It also identifies key areas of future research on health care financing in LMICs that would support progress towards UHC.

Item Type: Article
Keywords: Financial protection, Low- and middle-income countries, Policy analysis, Pooling, Purchasing, Revenue collection, Universal health coverage
Subjects: Health Systems > Health financing & economics
Divisions: Other
Depositing User: Mr Joseph Madata
Date Deposited: 26 Mar 2014 09:38
Last Modified: 26 Mar 2014 09:38

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item


Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics